Your Yello Ring Road To Success
GOOGLE LOGIN MY ADS MY SHOP

EU Proposes New Rules for Tech Companies to Combat Online Child Sexual Abuse

Combat Online Child Sexual Abuse

The European Commission on Wednesday proposed new regulation
that would require tech companies to scan for child sexual abuse
material (CSAM) and grooming behavior, raising worries that it
could undermine end-to-end encryption (E2EE).

To that end, online service providers, including hosting
services and communication apps, are expected to proactively scan
their platforms for CSAM as well as report, remove and disable
access to such illicit content.

While instant messaging services like WhatsApp already[1]
rely[2]
on hashed versions of known CSAM to automatically block new uploads
of images or videos matching them, the new plan requires such
platforms to identify and flag new instances of CSAM.

“Detection technologies must only be used for the purpose of
detecting child sexual abuse,” the regulator said[3]. “Providers will have to
deploy technologies that are the least privacy-intrusive in
accordance with the state of the art in the industry, and that
limit the error rate of false positives to the maximum extent
possible.”

A new EU Centre on Child Sexual Abuse, which will be
independently established to enforce the measures, has been tasked
with maintaining a database of digital “indicators” of child sexual
abuse, in addition to processing and forwarding legitimate reports
for law enforcement action.

In addition, the rules require app stores to ensure that
children are refrained from downloading apps that “may expose them
to a high risk of solicitation of children.”

The controversial proposal to clamp down on sexual abuse
material comes days after a draft version of the regulation
leaked earlier this week[4], prompting Johns Hopkins
University security researcher Matthew Green to state[5]
that “This is Apple all over again.”

The tech giant, which last year announced plans to scan and
detect CSAM on its devices, has since delayed[6]
the rollout to “take additional time over the coming months to
collect input and make improvements.”

Meta, likewise, has postponed[7]
its plans to support E2EE across all its messaging services,
WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram, until sometime in 2023, stating
that it’s taking the time to “get this right.”

A primary privacy and security concern[8] arising out of scanning
devices for illegal pictures of sexual abuse is that the technology
could weaken privacy by creating backdoors to defeat E2EE
protections and facilitate large-scale surveillance.

This would also necessitate persistent plain-text access to
users’ private messages, effectively rendering E2EE incompatible
and eroding the security and confidentiality of the
communications.

“The idea that all the hundreds of millions of people in the
E.U. would have their intimate private communications, where they
have a reasonable expectation that that is private, to instead be
kind of indiscriminately and generally scanned 24/7 is
unprecedented,” Ella Jakubowska, a policy advisor at European
Digital Rights (EDRi), told Politico.

But the privacy afforded by encryption is also proving to be a
double-edged sword, with governments increasingly fighting back
over worries that encrypted platforms are being misused by
malicious actors for terrorism, cybercrime, and child abuse.

“Encryption is an important tool for the protection of
cybersecurity and confidentiality of communications,” the
commission said[9]. “At the same time, its
use as a secure channel could be abused of by criminals to hide
their actions, thereby impeding efforts to bring perpetrators of
child sexual abuse to justice.”

The development underscores Big Tech’s ongoing struggles to
balance privacy and security while also simultaneously addressing
the need to assist law enforcement agencies in their quest for
accessing criminal data.

“The new proposal is over-broad, not proportionate, and hurts
everyone’s privacy and safety,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF) said[10]. “The scanning
requirements are subject to safeguards, but they aren’t strong
enough to prevent the privacy-intrusive actions that platforms will
be required to undertake.”

References

  1. ^
    already
    (www.whatsapp.com)
  2. ^
    rely
    (faq.whatsapp.com)
  3. ^
    said
    (ec.europa.eu)
  4. ^
    leaked
    earlier this week
    (www.politico.eu)
  5. ^
    state
    (twitter.com)
  6. ^
    delayed
    (thehackernews.com)
  7. ^
    postponed
    (thehackernews.com)
  8. ^
    privacy
    and security concern
    (www.bitsoffreedom.nl)
  9. ^
    said
    (ec.europa.eu)
  10. ^
    said
    (www.eff.org)

Read more